Harkness Discussion

The Harkness Discussion is a student-centered, roundtable discussion method designed to promote equal participation, deep inquiry, and collaborative critical thinking. Originally developed at Phillips Exeter Academy in the 1930s, the Harkness model is based on the premise that students learn best through dialogue and shared exploration rather than passive reception of information (Bain, 2004). Unlike traditional discussions, where an instructor guides and controls the conversation, a Harkness Discussion places students in charge, requiring them to generate questions, respond to one another’s ideas, and collaboratively construct meaning. The instructor serves primarily as an observer and facilitator, intervening only when necessary.

This discussion-based pedagogy fosters intellectual independence, verbal reasoning, and collaborative engagement, all of which are critical in both academic and professional environments (Brookfield & Preskill, 2016). Studies on student-led discourse indicate that when learners take ownership of discussions, they develop stronger argumentation skills, greater self-confidence in their reasoning, and an increased ability to engage in nuanced, respectful debate (Hattie, 2009).

Harkness Discussions in Online Learning

As more learning environments move online, Harkness Discussions can be effectively implemented in both synchronous and asynchronous settings. While digital platforms present unique challenges, they also offer new opportunities for structuring and enhancing student-led dialogue.

Synchronous Implementation

In a synchronous online environment, a Harkness Discussion unfolds as a live, student-driven conversation conducted via video conferencing platforms such as Zoom, Microsoft Teams, or Google Meet. Students gather in a virtual roundtable, with each participant expected to contribute actively to the discussion. Since the online space does not naturally replicate the physical dynamics of an in-person Harkness table, instructors may use speaking maps or dialogue tracking tools to ensure balanced participation (Fischer, Kollar, Stegmann, & Wecker, 2013). These tools visualize student contributions, helping prevent dominance by a few voices while encouraging quieter students to engage.

Research on student-led discussions in online learning suggests that moving away from instructor-led dialogues improves comprehension and engagement because learners must articulate their reasoning and respond critically to peers, rather than relying on pre-structured instructor prompts (Mercer, 2019). The instructor’s primary role is to observe, guide only when necessary, and provide post-discussion feedback on the depth of arguments, the clarity of reasoning, and the effectiveness of engagement.

Asynchronous Adaptation

For asynchronous learning environments, the Harkness model can be adapted using structured discussion boards or video-based conversation tools like Flip, VoiceThread, or Padlet. Unlike traditional online discussion boards, where students often post isolated comments and move on, a well-structured asynchronous Harkness Discussion requires multiple rounds of engagement.

Students must initiate thoughtful responses to a core text or guiding question.
Instead of one-off replies, they must actively engage with peers, build on each other’s arguments, pose follow-up questions, and challenge assumptions.
Discussions unfold over multiple days, mirroring the organic evolution of a real-time conversation (Hew & Cheung, 2013).

Recent studies on online discourse and collaborative knowledge-building demonstrate that structured, peer-led discussions foster stronger analytical writing and critical thinking skills than more traditional, instructor-led interactions (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000). This is particularly relevant in graduate education, where students are expected to construct knowledge together rather than merely absorb it.

The Role of Active Listening and Reflection

A defining feature of the Harkness model is its emphasis on active listening and intellectual humility. Unlike standard discussions, where students may focus on expressing their own viewpoints, Harkness requires learners to engage deeply with their peers’ perspectives before contributing.

This practice aligns with research on dialogic learning, which emphasizes that students learn best when they are actively constructing knowledge through engagement with diverse perspectives (Alexander, 2008). Metacognitive awareness also plays a role, as students must reflect not only on the subject matter but also on how they contribute to the discussion:

Are they listening effectively?
Are they helping facilitate engagement among peers?
Are they dominating the conversation or making space for others?

Developing these skills prepares students for real-world collaborative environments, where success depends not just on expertise but on the ability to communicate, adapt, and build on the ideas of others (Wegerif, 2013).

Applications Across Disciplines

The Harkness Discussion model is adaptable across a wide range of disciplines, making it a versatile pedagogical tool.

In literature and history courses, it fosters deep textual analysis, allowing students to debate historical perspectives and analyze primary sources collaboratively (Wineburg, 2001).
In STEM fields, Harkness can be used to explore ethical dilemmas, theoretical debates, or problem-solving approaches, encouraging students to think beyond formulas and algorithms and engage in scientific reasoning and inquiry (Chi, 2009).
In business, law, and policy courses, Harkness-style discussions mirror real-world case study analysis, requiring students to grapple with complex frameworks, legal reasoning, and economic principles while refining their ability to present and defend arguments collaboratively (Kolb, 2014).

By placing intellectual responsibility on students, the Harkness method challenges them to think independently while engaging in respectful, evidence-based discourse—a skill set that is highly transferable beyond academia.

Implementing Harkness Discussions

Set Clear Expectations

Explain the purpose of the Harkness Discussion and how it differs from a traditional discussion.
Emphasize that students must actively listen, build upon each other’s ideas, and engage in collaborative inquiry rather than competing to dominate the conversation.
Establish participation norms, such as balanced contributions, evidence-based reasoning, and fostering an inclusive dialogue.

Design Thought-Provoking, Open-Ended Questions

Avoid simple recall questions; instead, pose questions that encourage analysis, synthesis, and critical engagement.
Examples:
- How do different perspectives on this issue interact or conflict?
- What assumptions are embedded in this argument, and how do they shape its conclusions?
- How does this concept apply in a broader context beyond the assigned readings?

Structure the Discussion for Active Engagement

Synchronous Format: Use video conferencing tools to create a virtual roundtable discussion. Consider using dialogue trackers to ensure balanced participation. Assign roles such as “connector,” “questioner,” or “devil’s advocate” to encourage diverse contributions.
Asynchronous Format: Encourage multi-round participation in discussion forums or video-based platforms like Flip or VoiceThread. Require students to engage deeply with each other’s posts rather than simply responding in isolation.

Model Effective Questioning and Facilitation

As a facilitator, guide rather than lead. Resist the urge to correct students; instead, redirect with probing questions that deepen discussion.
Example facilitation strategies:
- “Can you connect this idea to an earlier point in the discussion?”
- “What evidence supports or complicates your argument?”
- “How does your perspective change when considering X’s contribution?”

Provide Scaffolding and Support

Offer guidelines on effective discussion techniques, including active listening and responding thoughtfully rather than just asserting opinions.
If students are unfamiliar with the format, start with low-stakes practice discussions before moving into more structured Harkness conversations.

Assess Thoughtful Engagement, Not Just Participation

Use rubrics that assess depth of reasoning, responsiveness to peers, and use of evidence rather than sheer frequency of contributions.
Encourage metacognition: Have students reflect on how their understanding evolved through the discussion and how they contributed to the dialogue.

Adapt the Discussion for Your Discipline

Humanities: Literary analysis, ethical debates, historical interpretations.
STEM: Inquiry-based problem-solving, theoretical applications, ethical considerations in scientific research.
Business/Law: Case study discussions, policy debates, strategic decision-making.

By implementing these strategies, instructors can create engaging, student-driven discussions that foster critical thinking, collaboration, and meaningful academic discourse in both synchronous and asynchronous online learning environments.

Conclusion

A Harkness Discussion transforms students from passive learners into engaged thinkers, communicators, and problem-solvers. Whether implemented synchronously or asynchronously, it challenges students to take ownership of their learning, develop intellectual curiosity, and refine their ability to navigate complex conversations.

In an era where collaborative problem-solving and critical thinking are among the most sought-after professional skills, the Harkness model provides a powerful framework for preparing students for success not just in the classroom, but in their careers and civic life.

By empowering students to lead their own discussions, instructors can cultivate deeper engagement, stronger analytical skills, and the ability to participate in thoughtful, nuanced discourse—making Harkness one of the most impactful discussion-based pedagogical strategies available today.

Learn at a Distance