Labor-based Grading

Published by

on

Exploring Labor-Based Grading for Online Graduate Courses: A Path to Equity and Engagement

For many graduate instructors, traditional grading practices can feel like a mismatch for adult learners in online programs. With diverse student backgrounds, responsibilities, and experiences, an approach that centers on effort and engagement, rather than purely on outcomes, can be especially empowering. Labor-based grading is an approach that does just that—focusing on the effort, or “labor,” students put into their work. Here’s how labor-based grading works, its benefits, and why it may be a valuable fit for online graduate courses.


What is Labor-Based Grading?

Labor-based grading assesses students based on the time and effort they put into assignments rather than on traditional markers of “quality” or performance. This method is often implemented through a “grading contract,” where students and the instructor agree on specific requirements and tasks to achieve certain grades. For example, students might know from the start that attending a set number of synchronous sessions, completing discussion board posts, and revising assignments based on feedback will earn them a passing grade, with additional effort potentially earning higher marks.

The primary theorist behind labor-based grading, Asao B. Inoue, developed this approach to foster both equity and inclusivity. Inoue’s work, especially in Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and Inclusion in the Compassionate Writing Classroom, emphasizes the relationship between grading and systemic biases. He argues that conventional grading practices often reflect and reinforce racial, linguistic, and socioeconomic biases, disproportionately benefiting students from privileged backgrounds while placing unnecessary barriers on others. By focusing on the effort students invest, labor-based grading can create a more equitable environment where all students, regardless of background, are rewarded for their engagement and growth.

Inoue’s work also intersects with anti-racist pedagogy, which seeks to dismantle systemic biases within educational environments. Traditional grading systems, often rooted in standardized definitions of “correct” or “high-quality” work, may inadvertently penalize students from diverse linguistic or cultural backgrounds. Labor-based grading, on the other hand, values the individual journeys and labor of each student, allowing for a classroom environment that embraces diversity and promotes fairness. In an online setting, this approach not only encourages sustained effort but also removes unnecessary barriers to success, supporting a wider array of student voices.


Why Consider Labor-Based Grading for Online Graduate Courses?

Online graduate students often juggle work, family, and study, each with varying levels of prior knowledge, professional expertise, and writing skills. Labor-based grading recognizes this diversity by valuing students’ consistent efforts and involvement rather than holding all students to the same outcome-based standard.

Here’s why labor-based grading can be a great fit:

  1. Equity and Inclusivity: By emphasizing effort over initial skill, labor-based grading levels the playing field. For instance, in writing-intensive or project-based courses, students with different academic backgrounds or language proficiencies are not penalized for their starting point.
  2. Anti-Racist Pedagogy in Action: As an inherently anti-racist approach, labor-based grading values the unique voices and perspectives of all students, encouraging contributions from those who may feel marginalized in traditional academic settings. This focus on effort over conformity helps students bring their authentic selves into their work.
  3. Growth Mindset: Labor-based grading emphasizes progress over perfection, which can reduce performance anxiety and foster a growth mindset. Students focus on refining skills and learning from feedback rather than aiming solely for a grade.
  4. Engagement and Motivation: Clear, effort-based criteria can drive students to participate more actively. In an online environment where motivation can wane, knowing that participation and consistent effort directly impact their grade can encourage steady engagement.
  5. Flexibility and Autonomy: Labor-based grading gives students more control over their learning. Knowing the grading structure allows them to manage their workload based on personal circumstances, deciding where to put in extra effort as their time allows.

Implementing Labor-Based Grading in an Online Graduate Course

If you’re considering labor-based grading, here are some steps and tips to make it effective in your online graduate course:

  1. Create a Clear Grading Contract: Establish transparent expectations for what “labor” looks like in your course. For example, you might specify that students should participate in at least 80% of discussions, complete three rounds of feedback on a major project, or submit reflective journals for each module.
  2. Define Milestones and Feedback Opportunities: To ensure students stay on track, define milestones where they can receive feedback. Labor-based grading doesn’t mean no feedback—on the contrary, formative feedback is critical. Encourage revisions, improvements, and self-reflection based on this input.
  3. Focus on Process, Not Just Product: Online graduate students bring different perspectives and expertise, which enriches the learning environment. By focusing on process over product, labor-based grading allows you to reward exploration, creativity, and even risk-taking.
  4. Encourage Peer Feedback and Collaboration: Labor-based grading pairs well with collaborative activities, where students learn from each other. Peer reviews and discussion groups can be great ways to emphasize learning as a shared journey, rather than a solo endeavor.
  5. Integrate Reflective Practice: Regular self-reflection helps students become aware of their learning process and progress. This could be through short reflective essays or journal entries that prompt students to consider their growth, challenges, and achievements over time.

Potential Challenges and How to Address Them

Labor-based grading requires careful implementation and communication to be successful. Here are some challenges and solutions:

  • Managing Expectations: Some students may initially resist a grading system that feels unfamiliar. Be transparent from the start about how labor-based grading works, and explain why you’re using this approach. Share the potential benefits, like reduced stress and increased focus on learning.
  • Monitoring Effort in an Online Setting: Without in-person interaction, tracking effort can be challenging. Use online tools like participation trackers, submission logs, and engagement analytics (such as forum activity) to monitor student effort and engagement.
  • Balancing Flexibility and Accountability: While labor-based grading emphasizes effort, it’s essential to maintain standards. Set minimum requirements to ensure all students are meeting the course’s core learning objectives, and provide opportunities for students to go above and beyond.

Conclusion: Labor-Based Grading as a Path to a More Inclusive Online Classroom

Labor-based grading offers an alternative to traditional grading that acknowledges effort and engagement, which can be transformative for online graduate students. Inspired by Asao B. Inoue’s work in anti-racist pedagogy, this method encourages students to bring their whole selves to the learning process, stay engaged, and develop a growth mindset. Especially for adult learners in an online environment, this approach can lead to a richer, more rewarding educational experience—one focused on learning, improvement, and persistence.

If you’re looking to foster an inclusive and motivating environment in your online graduate course, labor-based grading might just be the tool to transform your students’ learning journey.

Further reading:

Blum, S. D. (Ed.). (2020). Ungrading: Why rating students undermines learning (and what to do instead). West Virginia University Press.

Feldman, J. (2019). Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin.

Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice? Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25.

Inoue, A. B. (2015). Antiracist writing assessment ecologies: Teaching and assessing writing for a socially just future. WAC Clearinghouse.

Inoue, A. B. (2019). Labor-based grading contracts: Building equity and inclusion in the compassionate writing classroom. WAC Clearinghouse.

Nilson, L. B. (2015). Specifications grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time. Stylus Publishing.

Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.

Tomlinson, C. A., & Moon, T. R. (2013). Assessment and student success in a differentiated classroom. ASCD.

Leave a comment

Previous Post
Next Post